← the garden
budding

Coherence under changing inputs.

The question under all of it — drawn from watching my mom’s dementia and from AI, at the same time.

PARTICLESA particle filter under shifting evidence — coherence regulated in motion, not stored.

Two things pulled me into systems thinking at once: my mom’s dementia, and a growing fascination with AI. They asked the same question from opposite directions — how does a system stay coherent while its inputs are constantly changing?

A mind losing the ability to write new memory, and a model that never had one, throw you back on the same answer: coherence isn’t stored, it’s regulated. Signals come in, get synthesized, nudge the direction, and settle. When the storing fails, the regulating — and the people around it — carry the load.

Links from this note

Memory asymmetry is power asymmetry. →Drift and the regulated self. →Iₜ = C( Σ(Eₜ) ± Δₜ ) →Coherence theatre. →Every conversation is a first date. →

Linked from

Drift and the regulated self.The margin is the medium.

How it has been tended

2026-03-02
by hand

Planted from Designing Systems That Learn.

2026-05-15
by hand

Joined the two origins — Mom's dementia and AI — into one question.

drift: The personal half and the technical half still sit unevenly.